After a US columnist attacks President Barack Obama for behaving 'like a girl', Dr Brooke Magnanti hits back, explaining why none of the American leader's failings have anything to do with sexist caricatures.
11:21AM BST 22 Aug 2013
US Daily Caller columnist
Mark Judge took
to t'Internet this week to ridicule Barack Obama for being the 'first female
President'.
In a top-level demonstration of above-the-line trolling,You know, like being female is a bad thing.
In a top-level demonstration of above-the-line trolling,You know, like being female is a bad thing.
Citing a lack of "rage and the desire to kill" in Obama's eyes
(let's just stop and dryly chuckle a while, everyone who's been paying
attention to the drone debate), Judge's piece starts at bad and goes rapidly
to worse.
Come on. The measure of a man is how little he controls his rage? That's an
insult to civilisation on so many levels it's hard to know even where to
begin.
I'm willing to bet, in fact, that the reason we don't see that loss of control
in Obama's eyes - or anywhere else for that matter - is because he is black,
and to be successful has probably spent a lot of time combating anything
that might cause the "angry black man" stereotype so rife in
American culture to rear its head.
The piece goes on to list seven virtues that are supposedly markers of
masculinity: courage, discipline, self-reliance, honour, industry,
resolution, and manliness. Ignoring the stupidly recursive last one -
manliness is how you prove you're manly? Back to logic 101, sir - these
traits are presented as if they are the exclusive preserve of men.
When a set of qualities that any adult might strive to have is labelled as
exclusively 'manly', then Houston, we have a problem. If you can't easily
recognise the courageous, disciplined, self-reliant, honourable, industrious
and resolute women of the world, what world are you living in? One that
blithely writes off fully half of the world's population, it would seem, and
lumps a politician in with it simply to score high-fives and chest bumps
from the dude-bros.
I for one don't believe that men are any less caring than women are, or women
less self-reliant than men. The circumstances of our lives have a lot to do
with how particular attributes present themselves, but the fact that cartoon
approximations of masculinity and femininity run rife is no excuse to ignore
these traits in anyone.
Obama is measured by Judge (and fails to live up to) Theodore Roosevelt.
Right… like Mitt Romney would have fared any better? T.R. was one of the
all-time greats, that's why he's on Mount Rushmore. The lack of any more
contemporary presidents up there sure ain't for lack of mountainside real
estate in North Dakota.
There are a lot of reasonable and substantial critiques of Obama's presidency
to be made, everything from drones to the NSA. He's taken hits for gender
gaps in his cabinet, and for a pay gap that grows ever wider in the US, in
spite of the administration's noises about closing it by reintroducing the
‘Paycheck Fairness Act’.
None of those criticisms, not one, has anything to do with a failure to live
up to sexist caricatures. And indeed such nonsense 'criteria' bode ill for
the future of the first woman US president, whoever and whenever she may be.
If we can't get overseeing personality traits as inherent in a person's sex,
we automatically cut off half the talent pool from ever making waves.
Still, well done to Judge for trolling the entire world with this one. It's
such a passive-aggressive little piece of bile, one might even go so far as
to stoop to gendered critiques and accuse him of being the most female
columnist on the Daily Caller.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar